Student Value Critiques: Fix Drawing Foundation First

Two students submitted value studies. Both have the same core problem: they're trying to solve value hierarchy before fixing their foundational drawing. That doesn't work.

You can't plan values correctly when your cars sit too low, your figures are too short, and your eye level is misplaced. The value decisions might be sound in theory, but they're applied to a spatially broken foundation.

Want drawing lessons? Visit the Free Drawing Tutorials & Courses hub →

Watch video: hit play and learn the most common issues students face with value hierarchy, it's not what you think.

Critique 1: Ground Plane Disaster

Look at the reference photo. The ground level sits low, maybe a quarter of the way up from the bottom. The top of the car sits above that ground line - we're viewing from slightly above the vehicle.

Now look at the student's drawing. The cars sit way below where they should relative to the ground plane. The figures are too short. Nothing relates correctly to the established eye level.

The fix starts with one line: establish your ground plane first. That horizontal line is your spatial anchor. Everything else positions relative to it. Cars sit above it (we see their tops). Houses sit on it (foundations touch ground). Figures stand on it (feet on ground, heads above car height).

Get that wrong and perspective collapses. Your value hierarchy could be perfect and the scene still feels spatially wrong.

The watercolor execution problem: Beyond the drawing issues, this student lost control of wet-on-wet technique. Shadows bled into the car body, edges went muddy where they needed crispness. Cast shadows disappeared entirely.

The solution: timing. Distant background elements can bleed wet-on-wet. But when you reach the car and its cast shadow, let the road dry first. Then add the shadow with a crisp edge. You can't get clean separation when everything's still wet.

Critique 2: Half-Done Value Study

Similar drawing problems - eye level placed roughly correctly, but figure heights don't match, house relationships are off. But this one adds another issue: the value study itself is incomplete.

The sky has a few light scribbles. The white house stays mostly white even though it's in shadow and should read darker. The ground plane barely has value when it should be darker than sky. Distant trees are missing their atmospheric fade. The darkest darks (foreground tree trunks) never got established.

This is what "half-done" looks like: You indicated where things go but didn't commit to the value relationships. That gives you half-good art - some parts work, some parts fail.

The hierarchy that's missing:

• Sky = lightest (establish this first)
• Distant elements = lighter than foreground (atmospheric perspective)
• Ground plane = darker than sky
• Shadow side of houses = darker still
• Vertical elements (trees) = darkest darks
• Cast shadows throughout = essential for selling light direction

Look at how dark that curb shadow is in the reference. That one value change establishes two different planes - sidewalk and street - just through contrast. The student barely indicated it.

What Both Students Are Missing

Drawing comes first. Not sometimes. Not "if you feel like it." Always.

If you can't establish eye level correctly, your value hierarchy sits on a broken foundation. You might organize your values perfectly from light to dark, but they're applied to objects that don't relate spatially.

The progression is non-negotiable:

1. Correct drawing (perspective, proportions, spatial relationships)
2. Value hierarchy (planned lights to darks)
3. Execution (medium control, timing, technique)

Skip step one and steps two and three fail no matter how well you understand them theoretically.

The Core Lessons Being Ignored

We covered this in the foundation lessons: finding vanishing points, establishing eye level, building forms in space. These aren't optional warm-up exercises. They're the structure everything else depends on.

When you draw that car, you're not just putting a car shape on paper. You're positioning it relative to ground plane, establishing its height relative to eye level, making it agree with the houses and figures about where the viewer stands.

Same with figures. Their heads hit eye level consistently whether they're near or far. Legs shorten with distance but head height stays constant. That's how perspective works for standing human figures on flat ground.

Moving Forward

Both students need to go back to drawing fundamentals before advancing to finished value studies or paintings. Work through perspective exercises. Practice establishing eye level and building forms relative to it. Get comfortable with spatial relationships.

Then - only then - layer value hierarchy on top of solid drawing.

The value theory is sound. Understanding lightest to darkest, atmospheric perspective, vertical elements being darker - that's all correct thinking. But it's applied to broken spatial foundations, which makes the knowledge useless.

Building on Foundations

These critiques connect to earlier lessons:

Drawing basics: Drawing Hub - If eye level and ground plane feel unclear, go back to perspective fundamentals.

Value theory: Value Hierarchy Basics - The theory these students understand but can't apply yet because the drawing isn't solid.

Application demo: Applying Value Hierarchy to Complex Scenes - Shows the correct progression: solid drawing first, then strategic value planning.

What's next: Once drawing and value planning are solid, we move to finished paintings and execution techniques.

The Honest Assessment

My job isn't to tell you what you want to hear. It's to tell you what you need to know.

Both students understand value hierarchy conceptually. They know sky should be light, verticals should be dark, cast shadows matter. That knowledge is correct.

But they're trying to build on broken foundations. Fix the drawing first. Get eye level right. Position objects correctly in space. Make everything agree about perspective.

Then your value hierarchy knowledge becomes useful instead of theoretical.

Continue Learning

If you enjoyed this hand drawing course, explore even more lessons on our Free Drawing Tutorials & Courses Hub — including the complete How to Draw – Beginner’s Course.

Want new tutorials delivered to your inbox? Subscribe here and get free lessons, tips, and inspiration sent directly to you.